Thursday, July 30, 2009

Do Conspiracy Theorists have peer-reviewed technical papers that support their controlled demolition fantasy?

Peer reviewed papers and articles on how the towers collapsed..





Engineers Explain WTC Collapse


http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/052...





Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures


http://enr.construction.com/news/buildin...





IT WAS THE FIRE, CAUSED THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE - icivilengineer.com


http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/F...





Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact - Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22





Bazant, Z.P., %26amp; Zhou, Y.


"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)


Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.





Brannigan, F.L.


"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"


Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.





Clifton, Charles G.


Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers


HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.





"Construction and Collapse Factors"


Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.





Corbett, G.P.


"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"


Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.





"Dissecting the Collapses"


Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.





Eagar, T.W., %26amp; Musso, C.


"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"


JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.





Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.


World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations


(also available on-line)





Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., %26amp; Atchley, A.A.


"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"


The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.





Glover, N.J.


"Collapse Lessons"


Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103





Marechaux, T.G.


"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"


JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.





Monahan, B.


"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"


Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.





Newland, D.E., %26amp; Cebon, D.


"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"


Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.





National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs


“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”


Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.





Pinsker, Lisa, M.


"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"


Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).


The print copy has 3-D images.





Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)


Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.


NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)





Post, N.M.


"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"


ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.





Post, N.M.


"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"


ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.





The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering


World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects


A resource site.





"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"


ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.





The Towers Lost and Beyond


http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/


Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Eduardo Kausel, John E. Fernandez, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Liang Xue, Meg Hendry-Brogan, Ahmed F. Ghoniem, Oral Buyukozturk, Franz-Josef Ulm, Yossi Sheffi

Do Conspiracy Theorists have peer-reviewed technical papers that support their controlled demolition fantasy?
Conspiracy theorists don't deal well with facts. Their heads might implode. LOL.
Reply:Laugh it up, sheep. I don't think the people who died, or their families who are still clamoring for an investigation, will find this very humourous.


If you wanted an honest answer, you'd have simply referred to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth.





http://www.ae911truth.org/ Report It

Reply:Another excellent post!! This may be your best yet. Allow me to commend you on your efforts. Thank you.
Reply:Nice! Job job!
Reply:Great job !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:You Tube. Thats all they need and the cartoon channel
Reply:It was clearly NOT a controlled demolition - there is no evidence that demolition experts gutted out the buildings, pre-cut building members, planted explosives and then set off the charges (like what happened in the recent implosion of the building in vegas - read how long it took them to setup this building)





Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. is a demolition company offering demolition contractor services. Visit website for more info
Reply:If it was heat that brought the buildings down, they wouldn't have imploded. All four sides, with all the beams encased, couldn't have faulted to the point that it would come down evenly. If heat was the case, then the building would have fallen at the side of point entry. You, wanting to believe that airplanes were able to fly off course for over 45 minutes without being stopped is an issue you should tend to.
Reply:yeah here you go.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/


lots of info there.I can email more if you like


How is your calculus.anyway?You might just need it here if you choose to contact these people whose names can be found on this link
Reply:http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/...





http://www.nysun.com/article/48926





1st one was edited my first week here it is Clinton Body Count


as the next JFK thought I would share.





WELCOME to the political arena. It's election season and if u think Cheney made a mistake in firing make no mistake here. The HillBill machine is coming right up your doorstep.


Funny how these theories re-appear? It's Politics as usual Clinton style.


I bow to your mastery and brilliance. Keep on Writing!!!
Reply:We all saw the planes, didn't you?
Reply:hey jfk i got a video u should watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iDmaB5Bx... it is funny a silly conspiracy theorist!


No comments:

Post a Comment